More Self-Help And Less State Aid

It is said that Labour should tax the fringe benefits of pensioners, making a living wage compulsory for adults across the nation by 2018, and ensures the payment of child benefit for a second child is conditional on recipients going to parenting classes.

It appears that an equilibrated package has been contrived to get rid of badly targeted expenditure in the welfare budget, and now they want to nurture a firmer culture of self-help.

It warns that if monumental cuts were enforced, that it would place the burden of austerity measures on the shoulders of those struggling to get by, and as well levy searching doubts about the kind of society Britain is becoming, or has already become.

The British people have so far been outstandingly tolerant in the face of the austerity programme, which without quantitative easing would have immersed us even deeper into recession, however, people’s patience is now running out.

With 60 percent of cutbacks still to come, and public services starting to deteriorate quickly, with food banks springing up throughout the country, the general election really is the time to say enough is enough.

David Blunkett is now proposing that the winter fuel allowance, the Christmas bonus and the free television licence for pensioners should all be taxed.  He is also calling for pensioners who carry on working, for them to pay mandatory national insurance, and pay for prescriptions that are not for long-term conditions.

SpeakOutDavidBlunkett

He also proposes that anyone that applies for child benefit for a second child would be required to attend appropriate classes in parenting, money management and postnatal learning.

chb-claim

Not to be too ignorant here, but why on earth would a mother of a second child possibly require classes in parenting, and postnatal learning?  I realise that there are some parents out there that don’t have appropriate parenting, but children don’t come with a manual, and most parenting is taken from trial and error.

It’s just an excuse to stop people’s money because the government knows that making claimants go to parenting classes can be really humiliating, nearly as bad as being back in kindergarten, and not only that, women have been giving birth to babies for hundreds of thousands of years, and have still handled pregnancy without postnatal learning.

The government’s aspiration is to shape an economic system in which people are willing to put in the hours of work, and fund themselves, and bring up a family without having to rely on benefits to compensate their rent.  Hence, we are promptly becoming a possession of the state, and this is an indicator of our future, and I assure you, it’s not going to be a good one.

People Out Of Work Are Being Penalised With Hunger

There has been a blistering assault on the government for using hunger as a penalty for people claiming unemployment benefit, using benefit sanctions to berate claimants who miss meetings or who neglect to look for employment is amounting to a policy of calculated destitution.

The Government is presiding over a benefits system that places a harsher punishment on people who have the misfortune to be unemployed, than those found guilty of committing a crime.

The maximum punishment for missed meetings or not looking for a job, or not having enough Universal Job matches is the removal of living expenses and housing benefit for three years, in which benefit claimants will lose £11,000, but with the greatest fine levied by the criminal justice system, it’s only £5,000.

jobmatch_2433649k

The use of hunger as a punishment is just unacceptable, and it’s extraordinary that our government would choose to penalise lateness to appointments or sub-optimal job seeking in such a way because there is much more fairness in the Criminal Justice System, when it fines or incarcerates criminals, at last they ensure that they meet a person’s basic needs because when a person who perpetrates an offence, ends up behind bars, is given food, clothes and water, they are the basic requirements of mankind, in whichever form it comes.

Sanctions have left some people unable to purchase food for more than a week, and it has led to shoplifting, isolation and physical and mental health troubles.  The human cost of the sanctions system is exceedingly high, with some people even taking their own lives.

shoplift8_27

Sanctions have a ravaging effect on a claimant’s ability to look for work because those that have got a sanction dramatically shrink to enter their attention on the immediate problem of where they’re going to get their next meal, and not about looking for employment.

The Department for Work and Pensions declared that there were only a really small percentage of benefit claimants who were being sanctioned.   Nevertheless, there are large numbers who are sanctioned, and go on to face long term blocks on their benefits, and last year more than 800,000 claimants were sanctioned for a month or longer.

department_for_work_and_pensions_1

Benefits are frequently withheld on bogus grounds, and food bank charities like the Trussell Trust support people who have their benefits docked for failing to go to a course, or they had really turned up to, and others had been sanctioned for going to a funeral, rather than going to a routine Jobcentre meeting.  A Jobcentre meeting can be set up for another day, however, a funeral can’t be rearranged, and there needs to be a little compassion because without empathy it becomes a really savage world that we appear to now be living in.

24

It is far more probable to get someone back to work if they have a good relationship with the Jobcentre.  Once a claimant gets to the point where they believe that they can get work, that they want to work at, then the job is almost done.  They have to be given a feeling of self-worth because some of these people have been out of work for so long that they start to believe they are not employable, if they feel they are not worthy of a job, then they will believe it, and their enthusiasm to work will evaporate.  The Jobcentre needs to construct a claimant’s confidence and determination to work. The threat of a sanction is really going to block that happening, and can be really counterproductive.

job-centre-landing-page.ashx

There are some people who have been sanctioned again and again, and there doesn’t seem to be a process to examine what is going on.

The Jobcentre needs to find out if that person is really working, so consequently they don’t really care if they get sanctioned.  Perhaps that person might have a mental health condition, or that they are living a really disorderly life, and if they are being sanctioned repeatedly, then understandably something is wrong, and it needs to be looked into straightaway.  There could be mitigating circumstances that are beyond the claimant’s control because we all have different things going on in our lives, particularly when we have children to take care of.

We are not robots, and we do not function on automation, and people cannot be available at the drop of a hat because some have to obtain childcare, and not only find it, but salary it as well.  Some people will not even profit from working, and that is the sort of financial impediment people find everyday because going to work should be an asset above and across the scale.

Male robot thinking about something.

Younger claimants are put into really humble jobs with really low pay.  On a minimum wage, a person of 21 years and over is, probably, before Tax and National Insurance contributions are even taken out, they will likely get £227.50 a week, after Tax and National Insurance, it will be a lot less.

By the time they have paid out for rent, sewage, water, gas, electric, and extra costs such as bedroom tax, they are left with barely anything for food.  And it appears that there is not enough money to even buy luxuries, which a person should have. Taking into account, they have been working their backside off all week just to make ends meet.

The minimum wage for a person of 16 to 17 years old will be £3.79 an hour.  That’s a £132.65 a week, less tax and National Insurance.  Not much is it?  And Apprentices get even less than that.  Admittedly, most of these teenagers will still be living at home, but there is a majority of teenagers in this age bracket that don’t have that luxury for some reason or another, and most live alone in affordable housing given to them by their local council or housing association.

I’ll grant you that £132.65 is more than they would get on benefit, but of course on benefit they would not have to worry about paying their rent or council tax.  And of course, there are other bills that have to be paid for, and of course food.

In another incident Esther McVey, the Employment Minister, was given a picture of David Clapson, the man was found dead in his flat from diabetic ketoacidosis, two weeks after his benefits were suspended.

Unknown

A diabetic can’t wait two weeks, which is the amount of time David Clapson, who had been sanctioned had to wait to receive a hardship payment.

When David Clapson’s body was found in July 2013 by his sister, his electricity had been cut off, meaning the fridge where he stored his insulin was no longer operative.

No one should die like that in this country, alone, hungry and penniless.  The government, and the Jobcentre should know that sanctioning people with diabetes is life-threatening, and the system is processing everybody as a statistic, and everyone is just a number.

Esther McVey declined to comment on single instances, but stated that none of the reviews had established a connection between benefit sanctioning, and the death of a claimant.  That’s a cover up, and it disparages everything our society stands for, because it’s as clear as day, that if a claimant that is a type 1 diabetic is sanctioned, and has no money, and can’t pay for their electric because the Jobcentre has stopped their money, then of course, their insulin will have spoiled, which signifies that the claimant cannot take their insulin, and will finally go into a comatose state and die.

Esther McVey is allegedly off her trolley, and has no clarity into what goes on in the world around her, and I’m certain that if it were one of her family members that was in the same position, there would be no sanctioning for them, or would there?

Esther was in the opinion that this incident had been stirred up, and that all procedures had been pursued correctly, well clearly not in this case, otherwise David Clapson would still be very much alive.

UKIP General Secretary Calls For NHS To Be Privatized And Likens It To Nazi Germany

Unknown

Nigel Farage’s right hand man has stigmatized the NHS the greatest consumption of money in the United Kingdom, and compared the health service to Nazi Germany.

In a series of astounding comments, the UKIP general secretary Matthew Richardson condemned the NHS and called for it to be privatized.

His remarks, that were made for an American audience, will be an immense embarrassment to the leader Nigel Farage, who is now fronting calls to axe Matthew Richardson.

City Barrister, Matthew Richardson, 34, was employed by UKIP to keep unsound poppycock out of the media, however, he explosively likened the NHS, that has been treasured by millions, and was Britain’s greatest post war accomplishment, to Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany.

Matthew Richardson talked at two events for right-wing activists in Washington, where he set up fierce onslaughts on the service, blaming much of it on the countries debts.

A number that he couldn’t possibly envisage when he was younger, was now the amount of money that is owed by this nation, but at the heart of this, the Reichstag bunker of socialism, is the National Health Service.

That is evidently why socialized health care is so dangerous, because it’s a ratchet, and once in place, it’s extremely hard to get free from it, and as well. Matthew Richardson launched a bitter attack on taxpayer-funded cosmetic surgery.

Breast augmentation, hymen repair for those who want to be born again virgins, is compensated by the National Health Service, he narrated to an audience of young Americans.

breastaugmentation_1

If you have low self-esteem you get new breasts, however, if you’re dying of breast cancer you can’t get the treatment you require to stay alive.

Socialists believe that if someone wants to reassign their gender, the state should pick up the tab, they think that’s how the world works, so if you have a passion for she males, come to the United Kingdom, if you love freedom, remain here.

Appears a little cruel, nevertheless, he is extremely right.  The NHS has become exceedingly tawdry over the years, and oblivious of what the NHS was put there for in the first place.

The Labour Government elected in 1945, and made manifesto allegiances to carry out the recommendations of the Beverage Report of 1942.  The report’s recommendation was to make comprehensive health and rehabilitation services for prevention and remedies of disease, and was enforced across the United Kingdom on 5 July 1948.

The services were initially funded through universal taxation and National Insurance as part of the entry of a broader Welfare State.  They were initially exempt at the point of use, although some prescription charges were shortly ushered into the response to economic troubles.

Florence Nightingale is a historic English social reformer and statistician, and the founding father of innovative nursing.  She came to prominence while attending as a manager of nurses educated by her during the Crimean War, where she organized the caring for injured soldiers.

Unknown

She gave nursing an extremely favourable reputation, and became an icon of Victorian culture, particularly in the character of The Lady with the Lamp, making rounds to wounded soldiers at night.

florence2

Her societal reforms include amending health care in all parts of British society, improving health care and recommending better hunger relief in India, serving to abolish laws governing prostitution that was over harsh to women, and extending the acceptable contours of female participation in the work force.

Florence would be rolling around in her grave if she could see the mess our NHS was in, particularly now all dominance has been handed over to our government, so that they can break it up, and dish it out to whoever they like.

Florence would be leaping up and down with the wrath on her admonishing face because all her good work would have been for nothing.  Once upon a time the NHS would have been a sympathizing and caring organization of nurses and doctors that were there only for the health of their patients, merely because we are all human beings and deserve to be cared for as such, with compassion and care.

The government doesn’t really need to condone themselves for breaking the NHS up, but they will all the same, and they will strike while the iron is hot because now that they are coming up to a general election, they have nothing to lose, and then UKIP will take over, then the real lights will combust.

As we propel closer to the next general election, David Cameron will flounder about attempting to nail an opportunity where he can to demolish our nation, and it’s not by accident that he does this, it’s by intent, and like-minded campaigners in line for Prime Minister will do the same, only more so because they have no compassion for the likes of us.

david-cameron

Emotive compatibility by Matthew Richardson will incense hardworking doctors and nurses, they save lives every day, however, it appears that this UKIP character is seriously likening us to one of the world’s mass murderers.

According to Matthew Richardson, this Government consumes money like it’s gone out of style, and that the NHS was a monumental drain on resources.

His remarks will pile on the pressure for UKIP, and its projects for the health service, despite its claims that it is opposed to privatization, however, they all assure you that they will do something to better our country, only once they get in, they do precisely the opposite.

They are one large organization that group unitedly and work arduously, yet unemotionally expose themselves soon enough, demonstrating that they are simply here to accumulate money, and not to pass it around, as they spread carnage among those less fortunate.

Nigel Farage needs to dismiss Matthew Richardson, or at least come clean and acknowledge that UKIP backs a NHS sell off.

Either Nigel Farage backs this, or Matthew Richardson can’t stay in his office, because Mr Farage can’t simultaneously oppose these remarks, and also claim that his party stands for the NHS free at the point of use.

Allegedly this is UKIP’s agenda on the NHS, because they claim to support the service that almost all people in the United Kingdom hold dear, however, they want to disassemble its foundations.

UKIP can no longer endeavour to dupe the people.  They are a party of Tory people, with Tory money, and they want to unfold the most defective Tory policies, which would have the most awful effects on working people.

Labour faces a battle to stop disenchanted voters switching their support to UKIP.

They are unsuitable candidates to run for government, and they’re unfavourable in some people who will definitely not vote for them, and there is a worry that they won’t deliver what they have said in their manifesto.  They are really good entertainment, but further than this, they are not extremely good at competitive games, so, all they can do is show off to the public, however, to really deliver it if they gain in the next election, is exceedingly debatable.

If they win, and get into power, and they do sell off the NHS, which will capture the imagination of many investors and companies because the principle of Mergers and Acquisitions is that the parts are greater than the whole.

Matthew Richardson’s comments on the NHS are now a major embarrassment to Nigel Farage, who was himself forced to deny he backed privatizing the NHS, after comments he made in 2012 were made public.  As well, Nigel Farage was captured on camera telling his supporters that the state funded NHS should move forward towards an insurance based system run by private companies like in the United States.

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham takes a firm stand that forced privatization is being forced through like an amphetamine that could be fatal, however, their demand for control is like an addiction with a driven engagement towards its stimuli with extremely adverse consequences.

large-109785-andy-burnham

The trouble is, that negative effect that the government has on us, means that in the end it’s the individuals who experience the greatest levels of it, and that negative effect it has is unidirectional, unlike a guided missile.

Mr Burnham warns that contracts are being signed, which will be tied down to the following government.

Mr David Cameron, our Prime Minister was not up front about his designs to break up the NHS service during the 2010 crusade, leaving voters with no say.

Pressured NHS privatization is now entering a new dominion, and once in. It will be much more difficult to turn around.  Contracts are being signed that will run for five years of the next parliament, and beyond.  UKIP must actually believe they’re something that they’re not, and that their fraternity of predators will swindle the public out of something that has been given to us since 1948.

For the first time in 1948, hospitals, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, opticians and dentists were brought together under one umbrella organization to supply help that were free for everyone.

The fundamental rules were well-defined, that the health service would be available to all, and financed solely from taxation, which implied that people would pay into it according to their means.

Charges of one shilling were introduced in 1952 for prescriptions of one shilling (5 pence), and a flat rate of £1 for ordinary dental treatment, which was also brought in.  Prescription charges were abolished in 1965, and remained free until 1968, when the charges were reintroduced.  Today 2015, prescription charges are now £8.05

If the NHS was abolished and superseded by an insurance-based scheme, run by private companies like in the US, it would be catered for by many organizations, with healthcare facilities mostly owned and controlled by private sector business.

Healthcare would require extended regulations, and to a really high level and professional degree.  There would as well have to be a very high degree of administration that would be required, and the qualifications of such would have to be really high.   Although modifications have been made over the years in the NHS system, and it doesn’t appear to have bettered itself, so I actually don’t see how having private healthcare would make any difference, aside from those whose pockets the money is going into, because at the end of the day, it’s all about profit, and not the well-being of the patient.

If there’s not going to be any improvement, it will not seat heavy upon our government because by then the NHS will have been broken up and sold off to the most eminent bidder.  So, if the system does not work, and it deteriorates, there will be no attachment to our government, but to the private companies that bought into it, consequently, our government is off the hook.

Florence Nightingale’s voice was protected for posterity in a phonograph recording from 1890, which is preserved in the British Library Sound Archive.  Florence Nightingale said, “When I am no longer even a memory, just a name, I hope my voice may perpetuate the great work of my life. ”

Our government clearly did not understand what Florence was speaking about, and how much hard work she put into making patient care so significant, and how important it is to display compassion, and to lift a person’s spirit while they’re in hospital.  Instead, they would sooner downgrade the system, rather than upgrade it.  Private healthcare will not upgrade, it will not amend it, immaterial of whether it’s private or not, and you can whitewash it all you want because the system is so tainted now that no enhancement to it will make a difference, unless we realize why it was set up in the first place.

Go back to bare basics, go back to 1962 and earlier, and our government might realize that taking matrons out of the equation, and cutting nursing staff, and doctors because it was cheaper to bring in doctors from abroad.   Then our hospital system would be more adept.  Cutbacks are not the solution because we are dealing with human lives. That clearly matters no more to our government, all that matters is what they can gain from a human life.

There is a Professional Code of Conduct where professional organizations have their own codes of conduct laying out criteria’s of ethical behaviour owed by members of each profession.

Respecting a patient’s decision about their care, treatment and support are not happening any longer with the controversial Liverpool Care Pathway, where families are being kept in the dark about the fact that their loved ones had been put on the Pathway, and disclosed that hospitals had been paid millions to reach targets for the number of patients dying on it.

The Liverpool Care Pathway, was originally planned to ensure dignified and pain-free dying, which was trashed last year after a scathing inquiry established that it had meant that the handling of these patients was without thought, hurried and ignorant for the treatment of the most vulnerable patients, and in some instances patients were refused water as they perished.

hot off the press 2a

Under the Pathway, doctors and nurses determined when a patient was about to die.  Normally, a syringe driver would pump them with sedatives, while tubes giving food and water were detached, then death would follow, typically within 36 hours.

An inquiry was called for. After leading medical figures condemned the system as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and the thousands of families of patients who had died sounded off.

New prescripts for the care of patients viewed to be approaching the end of their lives will prohibit hospitals from determining that somebody is dying, and then hurrying their death up by sedating them and taking away tubes, and simply just giving them food and water, and some weren’t even getting that.

And it’s been going on for some time.  When my uncle was in hospital in 2004 dying of cancer, it was decided that because he was not going to recover, that they would take away his insulin because that way his organs would slowly shut down, and it would be a quicker death.  At the time we really didn’t have any thoughts about Pathway, however, now that we do, clearly it was more cost efficient to take him off the insulin because he was dying, and it would be a waste of resources, so the faster the better for them.

There is nothing more bowel twisting than seeing family or a close friend that’s dying in front of you, so everyone should spare a minute to think about our National Health Service, which has been part of the formation of our society, it’s part of our culture, that people are envious of all over the world.

09_Ukip_r_w

So, now it’s a free for all for any enterprise that wants to purchase a slice of the NHS, and the general public has to endure this sort of wish-wash that is going on, and the prognosis is really bleak.

Concern Grows Over Quality Of NHS Treatment

The government endeavour to make us think that it will be better, however, it surely won’t be without its problems, and that’s a big concern, and it narks the hell out of me.

Our government might look as if they have toughened up, but they have toughened up on the incorrect issues, and that one issue is unquestionably not our NHS.  Money should be exhausted in the one thing that we used to be able to count on, so what lunatic decided that it would be more economical to trade our beloved NHS off to the highest bidder?

Sometimes it’s better the devil you do know, than the devil you don’t, and we should retain what has been so iconic in our history, and that is the National Health Service because people know that they can rely on it, and it’s been trusted for a really long time.

EMINEM MADE DYING TEENAGER’S WISH REAL

Eminem isn’t always the raging rapper who rips people on tracks. Sometimes he’s the sweetheart who visits the home of a terminally ill fan, and doesn’t tell a soul about it.

eminem-24482-1920x1200

I don’t usually pen about anyone that lives outside the United Kingdom, unless it’s political, however, on this occasion, and looking at this article brought a swelling to my throat, and a lesson could be learned from this.

The fan in question is 17 year old Gage Garmo, who has been diagnosed with Osteosarcoma, a rare strain of bone cancer, and has been told he only has one week to live, and barely three days ago, Gage’s family and friends started up the hashtag GetGageGarmoToMeetEminem, in an attempt to, well, it’s obvious.

635567398901209386-Eminem-fan

And it worked, he arranged a home visit at Gage’s home in Michigan, which merely 20 minutes from where he lives.

Eminem is a bit of a celebrity, however, he went to spend an hour with this teenager, yet he was adamant he did not want the visit to become a media spectacle, and quietly arrived at Gage’s home.

The pair spent around an hour together, just talking and hanging out.  It meant the whole world to spend time with the rapper, and his icon.

The Real Slim Shady seems to be simply a big softy, although there’s no danger of him melting into my ice-cream… however, he does arouse my flake!

maxresdefault

He’s established a career on his tempestuous me against the world, however, Eminem expressed his milder side when he visited terminally ill Gage’s home.

He dashed in on a flight from Atlanta to his hometown, and arrived at the home of Gage Garmo, and the two sat down and talked about their passion for hip hop, and the Detroit Lions.  Tragically, Gage, who had been battling Osteosarcoma, a rare and fast-growing kind of bone cancer, passed away on Monday night, but his family praised Eminem for allowing their son a special last wish.

Distasteful Mocked Up Conservative Poster

poster-2

Councillor Healy, who is a prolific tweeter of anti-Conservative propaganda, retweeted the mocked up poster. The poster likens the Left’s extreme thoughts of Conservative party policy to the Holocaust. The post has substituted the long green country road going off into the skyline on the actual Conservative poster with the notorious location of the railway leading into the extermination camp of Auschwitz, Birkenau. The poster also has a new strap line of more people on zero hours, more tax cuts for the wealthy, and no more NHS.

It is estimated that 1.1 million people, many of them Jews, were wiped out at Auschwitz as part of the Nazi’s Final Solution.

jewish_star

It’s distasteful, and the Jewish people will be exceedingly disgusted by this poster. They don’t need it transmitted on billboards so they just have to live over what they encountered all those years ago, and this plane of incompetence should not be brushed under the rug.

We are supposed to have moved forward, not going back to the dark ages, but we seemed to be continually doing this, and in the end it’s going to be explosive.

There are already riots going on in France, and people are getting killed, or hurt, and now we are having posters put up with a theme of Nazism on them just waiting to explode, the Jewish community is enraged, and they will end up getting together, so that they can band together to take action.

Separately, we have no chance at all, and we can’t afford to be isolated because France is under attack. Seventeen people died in Paris in loyalty to the Islamic State militant group, and that’s what punishment Jewish people get for just being Jewish.

However, now they have to see this disgusting poster, is there no rest from persecution, or do the Jewish people have to keep visiting their past? It’s obvious that the Jewish people shouldn’t have to, but they keep getting reminded of it, and it’s uncertain when it will all stop.

Councillor Healy has now been debarred by the labor party due to her retweet. Nevertheless, she has since got into more difficulties when it was disclosed she had favored a photograph, calling the Royal Family a Nazi family. She has since erased her Twitter account.

Duke Of York Is Identified In Underage Sex Slave Case

A woman has said that she was repeatedly coerced into having sexual dealings with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around to rich and powerful acquaintances as a sex slave while she was still a minor, nevertheless, Buckingham Palace has said the claims are false.

andrew_1815625c

The accusation was made in a lawsuit by women who alleged they were victimized by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multimillionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with underage girls in 2008.

article-2610286-1D43C9D300000578-838_306x453

The woman lodged the case anonymously, and is understood to have been 17 years old at the time, which is viewed as underage under Florida law.

The prince is not a cited party in the legal claim, and has not had any chance to respond to the allegations, and has previously denied any sexual impingement with young women affiliated with Mr Epstein or any knowledge of his behavior.

Buckingham Palace refused to remark on the allegations. Evidently the palace can’t give comments about on-going legal processes.  This refers to the long-standing and on-going civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party to, hence the palace would not comment on the particular subject.

buckingham-palace-GETTY

Nevertheless, Prince Andrew’s Tycoon Buddy may have taken compromising photographs of him with the minor he is supposed to have abused.  Details that are entombed in original court papers lodged against deviate Jeffrey Epstein, 61, disclose that he taped the sleazy debaucheries he threw for VIPs at his lavish homes using secret cameras in the ramparts of the guest bedrooms.

One of the purportedly sexual meetings with the Prince, 54, took place at an orgy involving other minors on Epstein’s private land.  The financier, who was imprisoned for 18 months in 2008, after pleading guilty to solicitation for prostitution, kept a sickening hoard of pictures on a computer seized at his Palm Beach mansion in 2006.

Prince Andrew has become a frequent guest at the menage of Epstein.

The adult female in question, cited as Jane Doe 102, referred to the secret cameras in a 27 page filing at the Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida.

On the day that Epstein was taken into custody, police found two concealed cameras and photos of underage girls on a computer in the defendant’s house, and it is alleged that he may have taken obscene photos of Jane Doe 102 with his secret cameras and sent them to his other abodes and elsewhere.

There is no hint that Prince Andrew knew Jane Doe 102 was being held as a sex slave by the magnet, and she claims she first converged with the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

During a stop in London, they called on his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of corrupt media baron Robert Maxwell.  Jane Doe 102 claims in the latest court documents, lodged on December 30, that she first slept with the Prince at Maxwell’s home.

GMheadshot1

Court papers also alleged that Maxwell also was given naked photographs of her, that she had taken herself to Epstein as a birthday present.  The court papers added that Jane Doe 102 was also coerced into telling Epstein all about her sexual encounters, so he could use the information to blackmail the royal.

She further claims that she was used for sex trafficking for many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, influential business executives, foreign presidents, a well known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.

Prosecutors conceive Epstein, who loved seeing other people have sex, had cameras fitted to his other residences across the world.

Prince Andrew, who was photographed with Jane Doe 102 during a party in New York, was holed up in a lavish ski chalet in Switzerland. Nevertheless, Buckingham Palace has recapitulated his strongly worded denial of the allegations.

Prince Andrew, vacationed with Epstein in Thailand in 2001, and was surrounded by bare-breasted women on a yacht, however, an odd-job man who spent 11 years working for the mogul claims Prince Andrew frequently had massages when he was an invitee at the tycoons Palm Beach mansion.

Juan Alessi claims the prince enjoyed everyday massages from youthful women, and frequently came out beaming after his rubdowns.  Mr Alessi claims the massages were carried out in a private part of the mansion, that only Epstein and other chosen guests could have admittance to.

Mr Alessi also recounted how he witnessed parties at the waterfront mansion, at which the Prince was present while young girls cavorted in the nude, despite his friend’s 2008 conviction for child sex offenses, Prince Andrew carried on seeing him, and the duo were seen together in Central Park, New York.

The resulting craze led to him giving up his office as Britain’s trade envoy.

Epstein did 13 months before he was released.

Jane Doe’s claims against the Prince came after she linked up with three other women in a suit against the prosecutors, claiming they broke the law by neglecting to confer with them before signing a plea bargain for the tycoon, and it is understood that without the agreement he would have faced up to 15 years in jail.

The ongoing suit was lodged by Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, and cites the US government as the defendant.

The lawyers alleged Epstein’s handling was opposite to the Government’s normal approach in prosecuting federal sex offenses, and the US State Attorney’s office in Florida still has the offensive haul of pictures from Epstein’s Palm Beach home, which were caught on devices concealed in walls in the guest bedroom, nevertheless, the subject is still open to on-going judicial proceedings.

Ghislaine Maxwell marked claims against her as false, and her spokesman stated that the allegations against her were false, and that the original allegations are not new, and have been fully answered and proven to be false.

It was also articulated that each time the story was reiterated it altered with additional and lewd details about public figures and world leaders.  The woman’s claims are obvious lies and should be handled as such.  Ghislaine Maxwell’s original reply to the lies continues to be the same, and she strongly denies any allegations of a distasteful nature, and reserves her right to seek redress.

Buckingham Palace has denied any hint of indecency with minors by Prince Andrew, all the same, if Prince Andrew insists on hanging around with scumbags like Epstein, some of the sleaze were bound to rub off.

His friends have stated that the duke’s integrity is of the uttermost importance to him.  It’s a pity his awful judgement has made it so easy to question everything about the man.

The Duke of York has never learned from his days as Randy Andy the pudgy man-about-town, through his marriage to Fergie, and then on to a crony of society, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and now the claims that he had sex with a 17 year old girl who was being exploited by billionaire Jeffrey Epstein as a sex slave, it’s all absolutely disgusting.

Virginia Roberts alleges in court documents she had sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions. One of which was at an orgy of underage girls.

Are the claims of Ms Roberts true, who knows, it doesn’t really matter because the damage has been done, has it ruined his integrity, in all likelihood it has… however, the only fact that remains is that everyone is going to want to know if it’s true or not, particularly in the aftermath of operation Yewtree.

Prince Andrew’s blinding lack of judgement certainly needs to be analyzed, instead of people construing what they believe is right or wrong, until it resembles something like the truth.  He might have the appearance of an arse, but he’s a fine looking man, he could have any woman he wanted, especially with his huge amounts of cash.

However, if you hang around with the wrong people, like super rich sleaze bag Jeffrey Epstein, sooner or later you’ll start to reek of his filth, and become a spectacle of ridicule, vexing the public into believing that it’s true.

Prince Andrew was an easy target for a player like Epstein, and clueless Randy Andy, who only saw dollar signs, fell for it, and even more extraordinarily so, after Epstein’s sentence for perverting with minors, Andrew still stayed friends with him.

However, Andrew has a long chronicle of having his head turned by a pretty face, or a large bank account, with little worry as to what might lie behind them.  He’s had friendships with bad and tainted characters from Kazakhstan, Libya, Uzbekistan, Tunisia and more.

And it’s still an enigma of how Andrew and Fergie’s Buckinghamshire home was sold through a Kazakh businessman for £15 million, seven years ago, which was way over the asking price, and then left to go to rack and ruin.

Sunninghill in Berkshire is not the kind of place where you’d expect to discover housing dereliction.  It is a region with some of the most luxurious properties in Britain, where nearby are Ascot race course and Wentworth golf club.

Sunninghill-Park-Sunningh-002

Many of the homes have security gates and electronic surveillance cameras to glance over visitants.  Tradespeople are instructed to use the rear gate, and behind the brick walls and dense rhododendron hedges, the passing traveler can glance at larger houses with pillared porticoes, monuments more to blatant richness, than architectural taste.

However, high on a rise, set back from the road as you take the B383 north towards Windsor Great Park, one modernistic house rests shuttered and barricaded, like the dismal, decaying house in an updated medieval novel, but it wasn’t always like this.  Sunninghill Park was the home constructed for the Duke and Duchess of York on their marriage 23 years ago.

It has always been known as South York, a name bestowed by the tabloids because of its so-called resemblance to the sort of Texas style ranch popularized by the soap opera Dallas, but now its just withering away, uninhabited since the Duchess and her daughters moved out seven years ago and sold, evidently to a Kazakh billionaire, for a price which was well over the market rate, and it now rests deserted, its present ownership unclear.

When the Prince says his integrity is of utmost importance, perhaps what worries him is that people should perceive him as a man of integrity.

Madonna Apologizes

Frankly, I’m not sure how Madonna could have really likened herself to Martin Luther King Jr or the former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela – who the hell does she imagine she is?  She’s clearly assuming that she’s something that she’s not, which really does paint a picture that she’s unquestionably having some sort of issue in her life.

madonna26f-3-web

She went on to say that she was just admiring and acknowledging their Rebel Hearts – Nelson Mandela a rebel, not sure about that fact, but he was a freedom fighter, and the greatest man alive, when he was alive, and will for sure carry on being so for centuries to come, but I think she should have said rebellion and not rebel, maybe she should have named her album Rebellions at Heart…

nelson-mandela

If she wanted to compare herself to a rebel, perhaps she should have said she was a little bit like James Dean or Marlon Brando, which would have been a much better portrayal.

MTE1ODA0OTcxNjAzMTAxMTk3 Brando, Marlon_01

Madonna stated that anyone who fights for freedom is a rebel heart, however, she should also realize that there are different types of rebels, and some are not fighting for freedom.  Nelson Mandela opposed a cause, which was to free the people of South Africa, and for that it yielded a very high price, and he is an icon of admiration to all South Africans, and was of far more importance than being put on an album cover.